Really? Iowa?
This entire ruling confuses me. Iowa has allowed gay marriage, deeming it unconstitutional. Excellent, but how? How did those lawyers present this in a way that didn't work in liberal states? How did these judges look at this issue in a way that hasn't been done a million times by judges at all corners of the political spectrum?
It may be a great change, as well as a great precedent, but it leaves me more confused than satisfied.
